See full scan at the bottom of the page.
In 1934, author and social reformer Upton Sinclair shocked the political establishment by running for Governor of California on a socialist-leaning platform known as “End Poverty in California” (EPIC). His proposals drew widespread attention—both passionate support and intense opposition. This satirical piece of campaign ephemera, dubbed the “Sincliar Dollar,” was produced by Sinclair’s opponents, who aimed to undermine his economic policies by portraying them as reckless and communistic.
Historical Context
During the Great Depression, millions of Americans faced unemployment and dire poverty. Sinclair, already famous for his novel The Jungle (1906), embraced a platform that called for cooperative factories, land colonies for the unemployed, and the issuance of “production-for-use” currency. His EPIC movement gained national traction among those desperate for relief. But conservative forces, business interests, and parts of the press fought back, painting him as a dangerous radical.
The 1934 gubernatorial race became a microcosm of larger debates over how far government should go in alleviating the Depression. Ultimately, Sinclair lost, but the election remains one of the earliest major tests of liberal and socialist-leaning ideas in American mainstream politics.
Strategy and Message of the “Sincliar Dollar”
- Mocking Monetary Reform – By issuing a mock banknote labeled “redeemable, if ever, at the cost of future generations,” critics framed Sinclair’s plan as a reckless gamble with California’s finances.
- Ridicule and Red-Baiting – References to “Good only in California or Russia” and “The Red Currency” reflected the fear-based rhetoric tying Sinclair’s proposals to Soviet communism.
- Undermining Credibility – Spelling Sinclair’s name as “Sincliar” and calling him “Utopian Sinelair” trivialized his policy ideas. By suggesting that any “assets” were only “guaranteed by I. Governor,” the piece underlined what opponents deemed the plan’s lack of real economic backing.
Language, Imagery, and Symbolism
- Inflammatory Slogans: Phrases like “Endure Poverty in California” and “A Vote for Sinclair Will Put California on the Bum” used derisive humor to shake voters’ faith in his proposals.
- Cheap-Looking Design: The faux banknote, with comedic titles such as “Tom Phoney—Sec’y of Finance,” implied that Sinclair’s leadership would be a sham.
- Association with Communism: By emphasizing “red currency” and linking the note to Russia, the design tapped into widespread American distrust of Soviet economic ideas.
Impact
Although Upton Sinclair lost the governorship, the EPIC campaign influenced the trajectory of American liberalism, foreshadowing aspects of New Deal reforms and demonstrating the potent impact grassroots activism could have—even if it faced formidable opposition. The “Sincliar Dollar” stands as a testament to the power of political propaganda and the enduring role satirical attacks play in shaping public perception. Today, it provides a glimpse into the rough-and-tumble world of Depression-era campaigning—where creative, often scathing mockery was part of the fight over how best to solve the pressing economic crisis.
Special thanks to the USC Digital Imaging Lab for their support in digitizing this item.
