See full scan at the bottom of the page.

In the mid-twentieth century, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) was widely recognized for its post–World War II mission to aid children in devastated regions of the globe. Yet in the climate of Cold War fear and suspicion, certain right-wing religious and political groups saw the UN—and by extension UNICEF—as part of a larger communist or “one-world government” plot. What’s Wrong with UNICEF? is an impassioned pamphlet that exemplifies this perspective, featuring a Halloween-themed cover depicting UNICEF as a sinister, jack-o’-lantern-headed witch menacing the globe.

Historical Context

By the 1960s, a significant segment of conservative and fundamentalist American activists regarded internationalism—embodied by the United Nations—with deep suspicion. They believed communist ideology could infiltrate global organizations and erode national sovereignty. UNICEF, despite its status as a humanitarian agency focused on children’s welfare, was not exempt from these accusations. Pamphlets like this one appeared in churches and conservative circles, warning supporters that UNICEF operated as a propaganda tool benefiting communism under the guise of charity.

Strategy and Intent

1. Moral Warning – The authors cast UNICEF as a moral and theological threat, tying its actions to the alleged anti-biblical agenda of groups such as the National Council of Churches. They encouraged readers to reject or boycott UNICEF on religious grounds.
2. Cold War Allegations – Amid references to Communist Party members on UNICEF boards, the text argues that assisting “enemy nations” equates to supporting worldwide subversion. By highlighting UNICEF’s past disbursement of funds in Eastern Europe and Cuba, it implies that relief efforts effectively sustain communist regimes.
3. Alternative Option – The pamphlet concludes by directing readers to support “International Christian Relief” instead, an organization pitched as fully aligned with biblical teachings and free from UN control—reinforcing a “safe harbor” mindset for concerned Christians.

Language, Imagery, and Symbolism

• Sinister Cover Art: Depicting UNICEF as a wicked witch riding a broom suggests a malevolent force hovering over an unsuspecting globe. The cartoonish style belies the serious accusations within, but effectively grabs attention.
• Use of Fear: Terms like “world conspiracy,” “enslavement,” and “controlled monolithic structure” permeate the pamphlet, tapping into existing Cold War anxieties about infiltration and nuclear standoff.
• Religious Undertones: By juxtaposing UNICEF’s mission with the defense of “the Word of God,” the authors imply that supporting the charity is tantamount to undermining Christian faith—a potent appeal to congregations predisposed to view communism as inherently atheistic.

Impact

Though there is no evidence that pamphlets like What’s Wrong with UNICEF? curtailed UNICEF’s global reach, they reflect the broader mid-century pattern in which charity work could become politicized, especially under the intense ideological pressures of the Cold War. The rhetoric and imagery provided a rallying point for ultra-conservative communities, shaping local church campaigns against international initiatives. Over time, many of these arguments would resurface in debates over other United Nations agencies, foreign aid programs, and even international treaties—all of which some groups portrayed as threats to national sovereignty and religious orthodoxy.

Special thanks to the USC Digital Imaging Lab for their support in digitizing this item.