See full scan at the bottom of the page.
Originally published as a series of articles in The American Legion Magazine (January and February 1947), this reprint by Karl Baarslag reflects the intense anti-communist sentiment emerging in the early Cold War era. Distributed by the American Legion’s National Americanism Commission, the pamphlet purports to reveal how communists orchestrate protests, infiltrate unions, and manipulate public opinion. By offering anecdotal examples of “phony mass meetings” and enumerating “sneaky” tactics, the text aims to teach readers how to recognize “real, dyed-in-the-wool Stalinists” and fellow travelers.
Historical Context
In the late 1940s, global tensions following World War II sharpened anxieties about the spread of Soviet influence and communist ideology. At home, organizations like the American Legion increasingly positioned themselves at the forefront of anti-communist activism, urging citizens to be vigilant against infiltration. This pamphlet responds to postwar labor disputes and mounting fears that seemingly benign civic gatherings or charities might be “fronts” hiding radical agendas.
The “Red Scare” environment encouraged public suspicion, with new loyalty programs in government and calls for legislative crackdowns. Baarslag’s articles speak directly to those concerns, using colorful examples to reinforce the message that communist “agitators” lurked around every corner—ready to exploit labor unrest, picket lines, and civic protests.
Strategy and Themes
- Alarmist Rhetoric
The text repeatedly warns about “precious trouble-makers” orchestrating staged events. It characterizes communists as cunning manipulators whose small numbers are magnified through “front” activities and dramatic protests. - Guidance for Detection
Baarslag suggests that “if you know what the line is, you can infallibly spot its peddlers.” By highlighting so-called “telltale clues and characteristic tricks,” the pamphlet invites the public to become unofficial intelligence gatherers—watching union meetings, local protests, and social clubs for signs of infiltration. - Use of Anecdotes
Detailed stories—like a “large, enthusiastic mass meeting” of purported seamen, who in reality were “painters, furriers, garment, and dishwasher union members”—serve to illustrate communists’ alleged ability to fabricate grassroots support. Such vivid examples both entertain and reinforce distrust toward any unexpected alliances or large demonstrations. - Suspicion of Popular Causes
The pamphlet references “The League for Human Rights, Peace, and Democracy” or “The Carpet Workers’ Club of Yonkers” as potential communist creations—a nod to the fear that even moral-sounding groups might be elaborate fronts. Baarslag portrays left-leaning labor efforts, peace activism, and civil rights rallies as prime terrains for communist “string-pulling.”
Language, Imagery, and Influence
- Phrases Like “Real, Dyed-in-the-Wool Stalinist”
These descriptors emphasize ideological purity and Soviet loyalty, casting suspected communists as unwavering agents of a foreign power rather than just domestic leftists. - Ridiculing Tactics
By describing how “old salts” might appear as teachers one day and cooks the next, Baarslag injects humor, mocking perceived communist chicanery. This breezy style encourages readers to see themselves as savvy insiders, able to see through ruses. - Call to Action
Though less overt than other American Legion pamphlets, the overall message still prompts readers: watch for trouble, report suspicious activities, and avoid being misled by seemingly benevolent gatherings.
Impact
Published as the first wave of the postwar Red Scare was cresting, this pamphlet resonated with segments of the public ready to root out subversion. It added to the swirl of pamphlets, radio broadcasts, and official statements that collectively shaped a climate of distrust—ultimately paving the way for McCarthy-era investigations and blacklisting. Critics, then and now, argue that such materials fueled paranoia and curbed free expression, tarring genuine reform movements as communist plots.
Yet from the perspective of the American Legion’s supporters, Baarslag’s exposés helped everyday citizens feel empowered against an ideological foe. Some credit the era’s vigilance with preventing communist influence, though many historians point out the collateral damage inflicted on political discourse and civil liberties.
While the Cold War context has changed, the pamphlet’s themes—fear of infiltration, suspicion of mass gatherings, and the demonization of activist movements—still echo in modern debates about national security and subversive ideologies. By studying “How to Spot a Communist,” we better understand how fervent calls for “vigilance” can shape public perceptions, social cohesion, and policy responses during periods of national anxiety.
Special thanks to the USC Digital Imaging Lab for their support in digitizing this item.
