See full scan at the bottom of the page.

Published under the name “TAX FAX No. 76” by The Independent American, this mid-1960s pamphlet reflects a backlash narrative that emerged alongside the Civil Rights Movement. It blames the era’s urban uprisings and racial unrest on alleged communist infiltration rather than examining systemic racism or socio-economic inequality. By citing sensational quotes, FBI warnings, and grand jury reports, the text warns readers of “Red direction” behind the riots, attempting to delegitimize genuine civil rights grievances and stoke fear among conservative or moderate white Americans.

Historical Context

By the mid-1960s, a wave of civil rights demonstrations, legislative victories, and urban uprisings had transformed the national conversation on race in the United States. While mainstream civil rights leaders argued for the dismantling of Jim Crow laws and an end to discriminatory practices in housing and employment, some critics insisted that these movements were being manipulated by external forces—namely, communist agitators. This pamphlet exemplifies the “outside agitator” trope, suggesting that African Americans in cities like Cleveland, Chicago, or Los Angeles were pawns in an international conspiracy rather than protesting legitimate racial injustices.

Strategy and Messaging

1. Red Scare Tactics: The pamphlet repeatedly invokes J. Edgar Hoover’s FBI bulletins and references “Negro Communist leaders,” portraying civil rights activism as part of a broader communist plot to destabilize the nation. By drawing on official-sounding sources, the publisher seeks to imbue the text with credibility.
2. Selective Evidence: It highlights sensational incidents—Molotov cocktails, property damage, confrontations with police—and implies these acts define the movement as a whole. Excerpts from grand jury reports are used to suggest a hidden master plan, ignoring deeper economic, social, and political grievances of African American communities.
3. Fear-Based Appeals: The cover’s rhetorical question—“Civil Rights… or Anarchy?”—posits an either/or scenario designed to alarm white readership, while calls to “protest and make it count” aim to mobilize voters and donors against President Lyndon B. Johnson and other pro-civil-rights politicians.

Language, Imagery, and Symbolism

• Map of the United States with Riot ‘Explosions’: On the cover, ominous black splashes scattered across major cities visually reinforce the pamphlet’s notion of coordinated chaos, implying a nationwide conspiracy.
• Emphasis on ‘Facts’: Using phrases like “Here Are the Facts…” tries to position the content as objective truth. However, it offers only a narrow, fear-laden perspective, giving readers an impression that radical left-wing forces are behind every outbreak of racial discontent.
• Inflammatory Quotations: Passages from national figures—including Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., President Lyndon B. Johnson, and others—are either taken out of context or selectively edited to paint them as dangerously radical or naively permissive of unrest.

Impact

While mainstream support for civil rights legislation grew throughout the 1960s, publications like this pamphlet spotlighted the intense opposition that civil rights activists encountered. The portrayal of “Negro riots” as communist-inspired subversion reinforced broader Cold War anxieties, fueling resistance to integrated schools, open housing laws, and voting rights enforcement. Such arguments did not succeed in halting federal civil rights reforms but did contribute to ongoing political realignments—shaping, in part, the rhetoric of subsequent “law and order” campaigns. Even decades later, echoes of these themes reappear in debates over race, policing, and protest movements, illustrating how fear-based narratives can overshadow core issues of equity and justice.

Special thanks to the USC Digital Imaging Lab for their support in digitizing this item.