Skip to content Skip to footer

Leaflet: “A Call to New Struggles to Free Tom Mooney!”

See full scan at the bottom of the page.

In this leaflet, dated April 2, 1933, representatives of multiple trade unions from the San Francisco Bay Area issue a passionate call for solidarity: “Fellow working men and women!” They urge every labor union—and allied political or fraternal organizations—to unite behind the “Pro Tom Mooney–United Front Conference,” a collective fighting to secure a new trial and freedom for Tom Mooney, an outspoken labor organizer widely believed to have been wrongfully convicted of a 1916 bombing. Framed in urgent language and heartfelt pleas, the pamphlet reveals the depth of conviction among California’s labor movement that Mooney’s cause was central to the broader struggle for workers’ rights.

Historical Context

Tom Mooney’s conviction for the Preparedness Day Bombing in San Francisco (1916) sparked national controversy and protest. Many believed he had been framed due to his pro-labor activism and outspoken opposition to exploitation. Despite mounting evidence of misconduct in the trial, Mooney remained imprisoned. By 1933, sustained pressure from unions, civil libertarians, and international supporters had finally earned him a second chance in court. This pamphlet situates Mooney’s plight firmly within labor’s fight against an unjust legal system—one they argued would persecute any militant organizer challenging powerful economic interests.

Strategy and Key Themes

  1. A Mass “United Front”
    The leaflet underscores the need for unity across craft lines. Whether representing longshoremen, railway workers, machinists, or garment workers, signatory unions vow to “overcome prejudices” and collaborate for Mooney’s release.
  2. Appeals to Shared Identity
    Passionately addressed to the “Workers of San Francisco,” the text leverages a communal sense of injustice. It frames Mooney’s imprisonment as an attack on all labor, asserting that only a collective response can resist government and corporate “enemies.”
  3. Moral and Emotional Rhetoric
    Phrases like “he became obnoxious to certain powerful interests” and references to the “most flagrant and amazing frame-up in all history” intensify the sense of outrage. By equating Mooney’s ongoing incarceration with a moral crisis, the authors rouse the reader to urgent action.
  4. Direct Calls to Action
    The leaflet implores recipients to attend conferences, send delegates, and wage “magnificent numbers” to demand justice from authorities. Listing signatories from different unions helps demonstrate that the labor community stands shoulder-to-shoulder.

Language, Imagery, and Symbolism

  • Hand-Drawn Headline: The oversized scrawled call—“FREE TOM MOONEY!”—conveys an impassioned grassroots plea rather than a calculated corporate publication.
  • Emphasis on Struggle: Terms like “fight,” “frame-up,” “martyrdom,” and “triumph” evoke the drama of a larger battle between labor and entrenched power structures.
  • Collective Sign-Off: Featuring over a dozen unions and their representatives, the signature list is both a demonstration of broad-based solidarity and a rallying cry for hesitant locals.

Longer-Term Impact and Relevance

Tom Mooney’s case helped galvanize labor activism throughout the 1920s and 1930s. The widespread outrage at his imprisonment showcased the potential for unions to cross occupational boundaries in the face of perceived government and judicial bias. Although Mooney wouldn’t be pardoned until 1939, pamphlets like this one kept his story—and the notion of justice for labor organizers—firmly in public consciousness. His eventual release came to symbolize the power of worker solidarity and the importance of sustained public pressure on the legal system.

Today, this artifact testifies to the enduring resonance of labor rights struggles in America. It underscores how collective action can amplify a single individual’s cause—especially one fraught with claims of political scapegoating and injustice. Moreover, its rhetorical urgency echoes in modern solidarity campaigns for persecuted activists worldwide, reminding us that forging unity across diverse communities remains a potent tool for achieving social change.

Special thanks to the USC Digital Imaging Lab for their support in digitizing this item.

How San Francisco’s Labor Unions United to Champion a Wrongfully Convicted Activist
LocationSan FranciscoYear1933SourceAcquisitionRights and RestrictionsImage Rights: Museum of ProtestShare

Made in protest in Los Angeles.

Museum of Protest © 2026. All rights reserved.