How Anti-ICE Organizers Used Bad Bunny Towels to Hijack Super Bowl Optics
More than 15,000 anti-ICE activists managed to get demonstration towels into the hands of Super Bowl attendees—and onto national television—by doing something counterintuitive: they didn’t disrupt anything.
As 70,000 fans streamed into Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, California, volunteers from Contra-ICE handed out free rally towels at stadium entrances. One side featured a stylized bunny in Bad Bunny’s signature Puerto Rican jíbaro straw hat, kicking a football frozen in ice. The other side read “ICE OUT” in bold letters.
The timing wasn’t accidental. Bad Bunny—the world’s most-streamed artist and an outspoken critic of Trump administration immigration policies—was performing at halftime. One week earlier, he’d used his Grammy acceptance speech to declare “ICE OUT.” He told the world that immigrants “are humans and we are Americans.” The towels connected that message to the 115 million Americans watching the most-viewed program in U.S. history.
The Strategy Behind the Towels
What made this demonstration work wasn’t confrontation—it was camouflage. Free merchandise is standard practice at major sporting events. By working within that norm rather than against it, organizers made it easier for demonstrators to reach their audience.
“I’m a big ‘Joy is resistance’ person,” explained Shasti Conrad, a Contra-ICE leader who also serves as Vice Chair of the Democratic National Committee. “Today is a celebration of American sports, and there are opportunities to be heard here. We’re drawing attention to show that there is massive support to challenge the Trump administration and the Department of Homeland Security.”
The design itself came from acclaimed cartoonist Lalo Alcaraz, known for his work on “Bordertown” and decades of challenging racism through political art. His playful bunny image made the message shareable rather than threatening—cute imagery rather than confrontational graphics.
Each towel included a QR code linking to Contra-ICE resources, mutual aid organizing information, and calls to action. The vast majority of fans who encountered volunteers accepted towels. Supplies ran out by early afternoon as word spread through the crowds.
Accepting a free towel from a smiling volunteer—people didn’t have to agree with everything to take one. Unlike traditional picket lines that clearly show you support the cause, this approach created what Conrad called “cover” for people to participate “in ways big and small.”
Why Bad Bunny Mattered
The organizers didn’t secure Bad Bunny’s explicit endorsement for the towel campaign. They didn’t need to. His public political statements gave them cover to align their messaging with his cultural moment.
Bad Bunny had been Spotify’s most-streamed artist for four of the past five years, making him arguably the most culturally dominant Latino artist globally. His Grammy speech one week earlier had positioned him on immigration enforcement. He declared immigrants aren’t “savage” or “animals” but “humans and Americans.”
During his 13-minute halftime performance, Bad Bunny displayed a football reading “Together, we are America.” He concluded by listing every country in the Americas before saying “God bless America.” Rally towels in the crowd created a visual connection between his Grammy statements, the activist messaging, and the halftime performance itself.
This shows how celebrity activism has changed. Unlike the 1968 Olympics, where Tommie Smith and John Carlos shocked the world by raising their fists on the medal podium, by 2026 celebrity political speech had become normalized at major cultural events. Organizers could strategically align with that positioning without requiring active participation in organizing.
What Security Did (and Didn’t Do)
In the weeks before the Super Bowl, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had signaled that ICE would be “all over that place” to “enforce the law.” The administration backed away from that publicized presence, though federal agents may have maintained undercover operations.
Local Santa Clara police reported about 10 arrests during game day—for trespassing on the field, drunkenness, and vandalism. None were demonstration-related. No arrests occurred for towel distribution, and organizers characterized the activist presence as peaceful.
The non-disruptive approach appears to have enhanced rather than diminished the action’s effectiveness. By avoiding confrontation that might trigger law enforcement response and negative media coverage, organizers positioned the distribution as legal free speech. News coverage framed it as an organic volunteer initiative rather than a destabilizing force.
Outside the stadium, several hundred additional demonstrators marched against ICE enforcement along Great America Parkway. The march proceeded peacefully with police on horseback following alongside. Around 5:30 p.m., about two dozen activists unfurled a large yellow banner reading “Trump must go now.” They held signs featuring photos of Renee Good and Alex Pretti—two U.S. citizens fatally shot by federal agents in Minnesota in late December 2025 and early January 2026.
Who Organized This
Contra-ICE describes itself as “a group of artists, musicians, and community organizers standing up to the inhumane treatment and abuses carried out in the name of immigration enforcement.”
Beyond Conrad’s DNC role, the coalition included Way to Win and Movement Voter Project (progressive political organizations), the Washington State Democratic Party, and the Alameda County Democratic Party. Musician Tom Morello, guitarist for Rage Against the Machine, was photographed at the Super Bowl holding one of the “ICE OUT” towels, giving the effort celebrity support. He’d recently participated in a benefit concert in Minneapolis raising funds for families of people killed in ICE enforcement operations.
Alcaraz, who designed the towels, articulated the artistic strategy: “Art has always been a way to confront hate wherever it appears. When injustice becomes part of everyday life, artists have a responsibility to make it visible. In a public space and cultural moment the whole country is watching, images, color, and movement become a way to express love and push back against hate in plain sight.”
Media Impact and Political Response
The action generated coverage across national news outlets, sports media, and Spanish-language journalism. Broadcast captures showed towels in stadium crowds during the game itself, allowing millions of viewers to encounter the message without seeking it out. Social media amplified photos and videos of the distribution process. The QR code provided digital pathways for interested audience members to engage with organizing infrastructure.
But converting media exposure into behavioral change presents a more complex assessment. Accepting a free towel functioned as something easy to do that didn’t require much commitment. Whether people who took towels engaged with Contra-ICE’s resources, attended organizing meetings, or took political action—we don’t know.
U.S. Representative Ro Khanna, whose California congressional district includes the Super Bowl location, coordinated with 21 Democratic colleagues in a joint letter to Secretary Noem opposing immigration raids at the Super Bowl. This suggests the action made it easier for elected officials to publicly oppose aggressive ICE enforcement without getting backlash.
The president posted to Truth Social during the game calling Bad Bunny’s performance “an affront to the Greatness of America.” But the administration didn’t follow through on earlier threats of high-profile ICE presence at the event, possibly indicating that the political calculation had changed due to organizing pressure.
Polls at the time reveal that opposition to ICE’s tactics had become mainstream before this action happened. A Fox News poll found that 59% of voters judged ICE to be “too aggressive.” Polling from Civiqs showed 42% of Americans supporting ICE abolition entirely—an all-time high representing a 21-point increase from the 21% baseline recorded on Election Day 2024.
The Super Bowl action participated in a broader national conversation about ICE rather than generating it. The towel distribution amplified rather than started public concern.
Historical Precedents
Leveraging high-profile sporting events as platforms for political messaging has deep American history, though approaches and outcomes have varied significantly.
The most iconic precedent—Tommie Smith and John Carlos’s 1968 Olympic Black Power salute—shows interesting differences. Their gesture was neither low-profile nor non-disruptive. It represented an extremely visible political statement in what officials said was an apolitical space. The immediate consequences included expulsion from the Olympic Village and decades of media vilification, yet their gesture became arguably the most enduring image in sports history.
The stark difference shows how tactics have changed in response to today’s media environment. Smith and Carlos’s action achieved cultural immortality because it violated implicit rules against political expression, creating a shocking moment that made people pay attention. The towel strategy works within event norms—providing free merchandise represents standard Super Bowl practice—while hiding political messages in appealing designs subtle enough that officials struggle to restrict its circulation without looking like bullies.
Both approaches achieved significant media exposure, but through opposite ways: one through spectacular rule-breaking, the other through clever rule-following.
The “Occupy ICE” movement that emerged in 2018 around Portland, Oregon, represented a tactical predecessor to the 2026 Super Bowl action, though taking the opposite approach to disruption. Activists established continuous encampments around ICE detention facilities in Portland, Los Angeles, New York, and other cities, blocking access and creating around-the-clock vigils.
These occupations sought disruption as the core tactic: by making ICE facilities inaccessible, organizers aimed to make it harder and more expensive for ICE to operate while creating visible shows of support with detained immigrants. This approach generated significant media attention and inspired subsequent organizing, but also triggered police response and increased legal risks for participants through potential criminal charges.
Contemporary Organizing Constraints
ICE capacity expansion, federal enforcement intensity, and administration commitment to aggressive immigration enforcement created an opponent with lots of resources and legal authority. The administration’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act allocated about $75 billion for immigration enforcement over four years, with new hirings bringing the force to record levels.
Research on effectiveness provides mixed evidence about whether disruptive versus non-disruptive approaches achieve greater impact. Scholar Erica Chenoweth’s influential research on over 300 civil resistance campaigns concluded that nonviolent campaigns fully succeed in about 51% of cases compared to only 26% of violent campaigns. However, subsequent analysis revealed declining success rates for nonviolent movements over the past decade, suggesting that new tactics and changing strategies become necessary as governments get better at stopping them.
Strategic Questions and Future Trajectory
Can peaceful, visible actions that keep happening maintain pressure on federal enforcement agencies, or do they fade into background noise? The Super Bowl generated a one-time spike in attention, but turning that into lasting organization presents a different challenge.
Does working within event norms—rather than violating them—represent smart strategy or a limitation forced on them by stronger enforcement? The towel distribution avoided legal risks and reached massive audiences, but it also avoided making it harder for ICE to operate.
How do organizers balance accessibility—making participation low-commitment and emotionally comfortable—with the need to build a lasting movement that needs people to get more involved? Accepting a free towel requires minimal commitment; whether that translates to attending meetings, volunteering, or political action remains uncertain.
The role of celebrity positioning presents its own strategic considerations. Bad Bunny’s cultural dominance and public political statements provided cover for organizers to align their messaging with his halftime moment. But this approach depends on celebrities maintaining consistent political positioning and organizers correctly anticipating their messaging—a shaky foundation for long-term campaigns.
As of early 2026, several developments affected where the anti-ICE movement was headed. The administration appeared to be pulling back on some enforcement following the fatal shootings in Minneapolis. A federal judge ruled that ICE agents couldn’t use pepper spray or nonlethal projectiles against peaceful demonstrators in Operation Metro Surge. However, the president simultaneously announced deployment of an additional 1,000 ICE officers to Minnesota and pursued broader policy escalation, suggesting the pullback was temporary, not a real change.
The 2026 midterm elections present a key timeline in which immigration enforcement represents a major campaign issue. With 59% of voters perceiving ICE as “too aggressive” and 42% supporting abolition, the issue has potential to influence electoral outcomes. Contra-ICE and allied organizations would likely intensify organizing during election season.
Historical precedent from other enforcement-challenging movements suggests that sustained campaigns require continuous innovation, keeping groups together and building strength in the communities most affected. The Super Bowl action represented tactical innovation; maintaining momentum requires translating one-time visibility into sustained organizing infrastructure.
The Role of Art in Political Movements
The Super Bowl towel distribution highlights how visual art and design have become central to contemporary organizing. Alcaraz’s playful bunny design transformed a political message into something people wanted to hold, photograph, and share—turning participants into messengers.
This approach builds on a long tradition of political art, from the iconic “Hope” poster in Obama’s 2008 campaign to the pink pussy hats of the 2017 Women’s March. What makes these images effective is their ability to communicate complex political positions through simple, emotionally resonant visuals that work across language barriers and educational backgrounds.
The towel design succeeded because it balanced multiple functions: it was cute enough to be non-threatening, political enough to convey a clear message, and tied closely enough to Bad Bunny’s cultural moment to feel relevant. The QR code added a practical element, creating a bridge from passive reception to active engagement.
For movements facing well-funded opposition and sophisticated security apparatus, art offers advantages that traditional organizing sometimes cannot. A compelling image can spread virally without requiring physical presence or risking arrest. It can reach people who would never attend a rally or sign a petition. And it can make political participation feel joyful rather than burdensome—an important consideration for sustaining long-term engagement.
This article analyzes protest and activism tactics for educational purposes. We aim to contribute to effective and ethical efforts across the political spectrum, and we present diverse viewpoints and ideas without endorsement.